Our Manifesto

Why Engineering Can’t Be a Commodity

Image
Content icon

Why Engineering Can’t Be a Commodity

If every engineering firm claims the same credentials — broadband know-how, licensed P.E.s, fiber design experience — then why do so many projects stall, overrun budgets or fall short of what communities need?

The answer is simple: not all engineering is created equal. And settling for the minimum requirements is setting projects up to fail.

While all the marketing material may sound the same, when projects move from paper to the field the differences are glaring. Some deployments stall in permitting. Some collapse under cost overruns. Others get built only to fall short of what the community actually needed.

That’s because engineering has quietly slipped into being a commodity.

Fiber providers may not realize it, but too many shop for fiber engineering like a utility: interchangeable, low-bid, good enough. But “good enough” engineering is a myth. And in today’s world, with heightened competition, unprecedented funding, high public visibility and transformative technology shifts, it’s also a risk.

It’s time to draw the line. Engineering should no longer be a line item relegated to a status quo vendor. Engineering should be the differentiator. Rural providers, local communities, Tribal organizations, etc. – you should all expect more. Before it’s too late.

Content icon

When Engineering Becomes a Commodity

Commoditization happens when firms sell minimums and sameness. A stamped set of drawings looks identical whether it came from a seasoned P.E. who’s walked the route or a junior engineer churning out templates from an office. On bid day, it’s easy to treat them the same.

But here’s the truth: the price of sameness is hidden in not-so-easy-to-spot delays, overruns and missed opportunities.

The most common potholes we hear from small operators:

  • Permitting stalls. If designs don’t anticipate local codes or right-of-way realities, providers can wait months while applications are rejected and resubmitted.
  • Compliance risks. Funding agencies demand documentation and adherence to technical standards. Cut corners on engineering and you could face claw backs or fail an audit.
  • Short-sighted designs. A network engineered only for today’s bandwidth is obsolete before it’s built. Retrofitting for tomorrow’s needs doubles the cost.

Treating engineering as a commodity might seem harmless, but the results aren’t. Projects stall, costs climb and communities pay the price.

Content icon

What Quality Really Means

If engineering needs to rise above the level of commodity and become an enabler of success and growth, what does “more” look like in practice? At ACG, quality means more than code compliance, a drive-by approval from a P.E. or doing just enough to pass inspection. It’s engineering that’s holistic and serves the end-to-end deployment strategy.

While the following imperatives seem like “more” to some, to us they’re just a Tuesday.

  • P.E. comes standard. We put a licensed, tenured professional engineer on every project. Not as a figurehead or an end-of-the-line rubber stamp but as an active participant in design, permitting and oversight.
  • Integration, not isolation. We embed with in house operations, engineering and construction teams. We don’t throw plans over the fence by email. We sit alongside you, aligning every step to your goals.
  • End-to-end stewardship. From big picture strategy to funding applications to construction oversight, we stay engaged. The. Whole. Time. Because quality isn’t proven on paper; it’s proven in person in the field.

That’s the difference between commodity services and differentiated engineering. One simply stamps the plans. The other ensures your project is completed on time and under budget.

Content icon

The Cost of Settling

It’s tempting to believe you’ll save money by treating engineering as a commodity. Pick the low bid, trim the hours, push permitting and construction oversight onto other vendors or your internal staff. But those “savings” rarely hold up.

Settling for commodity engineering isn’t saving. It’s deferring costs — and amplifying risks.

Content icon

The New Standard

Today’s environment doesn’t allow for shortcuts. With billions in federal and state funding in play, every project is under a microscope. Communities expect results. Agencies expect compliance. Subscribers expect service that keeps pace with demand.

That means the new standard for engineering has to be higher:

  • P.E. participation throughout: Expect an experienced, senior professional at every step.
  • Anticipate, don’t react: Identify permitting bottlenecks before they become delays.
  • Design for compliance: Build documentation into the process, not after the fact.
  • Engineer for tomorrow: Design networks that anticipate future capacity, redundancy and resiliency needs — from multi-gig service demand to smart infrastructure and emerging technologies yet to come.

In short, providers should demand engineering that sees around corners and delivers the “and then some” that addresses your full set of needs.

Content icon

Our Commitment

At ACG, this elevated engineering approach is more than a pitch. It’s our core operating principle. We believe the stakes are too high for rural providers, Tribal organizations and communities to settle for commodity engineering. That’s why we’ve built our model around licensed expertise, deep integration with your team and accountability at every step.

We don’t just check boxes; we clear paths. We don’t just design networks; we design outcomes. And we don’t just deliver plans; we deliver confidence and results.

Because we’ve seen what happens when engineering is treated as a differentiator: projects move faster, teams stay aligned and communities get the networks they deserve.

Content icon

Expect More

Our north star is quality and, as such, engineering cannot be and should not be a “business as usual” item and certainly not a commodity. Network strategy and professional engineering should be the foundation of every successful deployment. Every organization – especially small outfits – should demand more from their engineers, and we as an industry should raise the bar.

The wave of opportunity is real. But it won’t be delivered by engineering firms selling and delivering sameness. It will be seized by those operators who treat engineering as a differentiator and require their engineering partner to deliver on that promise.

At ACG, that’s exactly what we do. And if you’re ready to expect more, we’d be glad to show you what that looks like.

Start a Conversation